Sure! Here’s the translation:
Swiss Operator Launches Beem, a SASE Solution Built on National Infrastructure, Marking a Strategic Shift from Global Cloud Dependence. Is It a European Quirk or a Sign of What’s Coming?
For years, major technological narratives pushed telecommunications operators towards outsourcing. The cloud was the way. Global vendors, the natural allies. The mission: simplify, scale, delegate. But Swisscom, Switzerland’s historic operator, has just said something different through actions, not speeches: it has launched beem, a sovereign SASE solution that breaks with that paradigm. Built in its own data centers, operated from its national network, with local inspection and total data control. All under Swiss jurisdiction.
In a sector dominated by providers like Zscaler, Cisco, or Palo Alto, Swisscom’s gesture may seem anecdotal. But it is not. It is a direct challenge to the cloud-delivered SASE model and a clear bet on operational autonomy, in a context where digital sovereignty is no longer a whim, but a necessity.
What is Beem and Why Does It Matter?
Beem does not propose abandoning SASE architecture — that convergence of connectivity and security that redefines secure access to applications in the era of remote work. What it proposes is to reformulate its foundations: no more distributed POPs in foreign infrastructures, no more inspection as outsourced service, no more loss of traceability.
Swisscom integrates it directly into its fixed and mobile network, with SIM authentication, its own traffic inspection, data plane control, and national service management. It does not seek speed or scalability as the only success metrics, but control, governance, and trust.
A Swiss Case with No Regional Relevance?
For many operators in Latin America, this bet may seem distant. Local infrastructure is still uneven, regulatory pressure regarding digital sovereignty is minimal, and the cost of operating one’s own data centers is not always viable. But the precedent matters.
The trend in the region has followed the opposite route: progressive outsourcing, dependence on SaaS providers, migration to public clouds. All under the argument of reducing costs and speeding up deployment times. But this logic leaves critical flanks exposed: what happens to data jurisdiction? What about traceability in the event of incidents? What about future regulatory compliance?
Swisscom offers an alternative for environments where those factors are non-negotiable: governments, healthcare, banking, critical infrastructure. And although it may not be the path for everyone, it demonstrates that technical control remains possible… if there is will and strategy.
SASE as a Symbol of a Deeper Change
The true impact of beem lies not in how it inspects traffic, but where it does so and who has control. Versa Networks, the tech provider behind the project, talks about "air-gapped deployments," in-country inspection, and self-determined architecture. Terms that until recently were reserved for government agencies and central banks now enter the portfolio of a commercial operator.
This raises an underlying tension in the entire industry: efficiency vs. sovereignty, convenience vs. responsibility. Swisscom has opted for the latter path. Not because it is more profitable in the short term, but because it believes that’s where the new value proposition lies for certain sectors.
And Latin America?
The Latin American context is different but not alien. The region has yet to face a regulatory wave like the European GDPR or the NIS2 directive, but the debate over digital sovereignty is beginning to gain traction. From digital identity plans to the expansion of public cloud, the question of who has real control over data is starting to unsettle governments and companies.
Beem presents a soft yet powerful disruption: it demonstrates that the telco can once again be a custodian, not just a transporter of data. That there is room to build solutions where compliance does not depend on contracts but on architecture. That governance can be part of the product, not just the discourse.
Conclusion: A Swiss Trend or a Strategic Necessity?
Swisscom has not reinvented technology; it has redefined the operational context. Beem does not compete on price nor seek volume. Its value lies in providing an alternative for those who do not want or cannot delegate further. Its impact will not be measured in market share, but in precedents.
For Latin America, looking towards beem is not about copying but about reflecting. On how to build trust. On what it means to be an operator today. On whether operational efficiency justifies giving up control. Because, ultimately, digital sovereignty is also a matter of power.
And perhaps the real question is not whether we can afford to take control back. But whether we can afford not to have it.
Source: Telesemana
Let me know if you need anything else!