Oracle Cancels $7B Tencent AI Chip Deal

X (Twitter) Facebook Pinterest LinkedIn E-mail

Oracle has canceled a five-year, roughly $7 billion deal to lease artificial intelligence (AI) computing capacity to Tencent, the Financial Times (FT) reported on Wednesday, 11/04/2026. The agreement would have given the Chinese group access to up to 100,000 advanced AI chips installed in data centers across Southeast Asia. The British newspaper, citing two people familiar with the matter, traces the reversal back to concerns raised by US officials.

The Oracle-Tencent contract cancellation in 30 seconds

Oracle has canceled, according to the FT, a five-year, roughly $7 billion contract with Tencent.
The deal gave access to up to 100,000 advanced AI chips in Oracle data centers across Southeast Asia.
The newspaper attributes it to concern from US officials and objections from Chinese authorities.
Neither Oracle nor Tencent has commented, and leasing capacity abroad still isn’t banned.

The same FT had reported in early October that Tencent had signed that contract in early 2026, that it was its largest leasing agreement with a US cloud provider outside China, and that it paid around 30% upfront. Now, according to the newspaper, Chinese authorities also came to question the deal and encouraged Tencent to bet on domestically made chips. Several outlets report that officials from Guangdong province, where the company is headquartered, were the ones who asked it to support the local semiconductor industry.

Neither party has confirmed the information. Reuters, which couldn’t verify it independently, said Oracle, Tencent, and the White House didn’t respond to requests for comment. There’s also no formal order from the US government forcing the cancellation, nor a statement from the Department of Commerce on this case. According to The Motley Fool, Oracle’s shares fell in premarket trading on Wednesday after the news broke.

What’s Known About the Contract, and What’s Still Unclear

The published reports agree on the essentials: a five-year contract, a value close to $7 billion, and access to around 100,000 advanced AI chips spread across several Oracle data centers in Southeast Asia. Reuters describes it as a “multibillion-dollar” contract, while Bloomberg and the FT itself put the figure at $7 billion.

Two relevant details are missing from every source consulted. The first is the chip model. Reports speak of advanced processors that can’t be sold in China under US export controls, which points to high-end graphics processing units (GPUs), but it hasn’t been published whether these were from NVIDIA’s Blackwell generation or another one. The second is the exact location: the coverage only mentions Southeast Asia, without naming countries.

It also hasn’t been detailed what happens to the upfront payment that, according to the FT, Tencent had made. The company did explain in its second-quarter results that its free cash flow was negative, at 13.8 billion yuan, due to heavy investment in AI infrastructure and prepayments for computing capacity, without naming its suppliers. According to The Next Web, Tencent executives indicated at the time that this capacity would first be used to train larger models in its Hunyuan family.

The Cloud, the Route Washington Wants to Watch

The case puts the spotlight on a gray area in export controls: Chinese companies can’t buy NVIDIA’s most advanced AI chips, but current US rules don’t ban them from renting capacity in data centers located outside China. That margin is what allowed deals like Tencent’s with Oracle.

The Biden administration tried to regulate global access to these chips with the so-called AI Diffusion Rule, published on 01/15/2025. The Bureau of Industry and Security (BIS), part of the Department of Commerce, announced its rescission on 05/13/2025, two days before its compliance obligations were due to take effect. In its place, the BIS published guidance warning of the consequences of letting US chips be used to train or run Chinese AI models, and asking companies to watch for diversions in the supply chain.

Congress has gone further. The House of Representatives passed the Remote Access Security Act on 01/12/2026, by a vote of 369 to 22 according to Caixin, a bill championed by Republican Mike Lawler that extends export controls to remote access to controlled technology via cloud services. If it becomes law, that access would require a license even if the chips never leave the country where they’re installed. It still needs Senate approval, where a similar 2024 proposal never got a vote.

Meanwhile, pressure is building through other channels. The FT reported on Tuesday, 11/03/2026, that NVIDIA has told its cloud customers that at least 51% of its capacity must be sold to companies outside China. According to outlets citing The Information, that guidance would apply to future contracts and wouldn’t be strictly enforced. There’s no published evidence that this NVIDIA guidance influenced Oracle’s decision.

This isn’t a new topic for this outlet. The restrictions have pushed Chinese tech companies toward models adapted for their own market, as this outlet reported when Chinese tech companies were told they’d wait months for NVIDIA’s RTX PRO 5500, following demand that, according to reports published in October, led to orders for up to 3 million of these cards.

ByteDance, Alibaba, and Malaysia’s Role

Tencent isn’t the only major Chinese group seeking computing capacity outside its borders. According to the FT, ByteDance and Alibaba maintain significant chip-leasing agreements with US cloud providers, and Oracle remains a key supplier to ByteDance in Asia, with several data centers in Malaysia. No published information points, for now, to changes in those contracts.

Malaysia has gained weight on this map. Oracle announced in October 2024 an investment of more than $6.5 billion in the country to open a public cloud region with its AI services. In March 2026, the Wall Street Journal reported that ByteDance was set to access around 36,000 NVIDIA Blackwell B200 chips through a local operator, Aolani Cloud. The Malaysian government, for its part, has required a permit since 07/14/2025 to export, transship, or transit US-origin AI chips, and the BIS had already announced new licensing requirements in May 2025 for shipping these chips to Malaysia and Thailand over diversion risk.

For US cloud providers, the Oracle-Tencent case shifts the focus from chip sales to how the leased capacity is actually used. With the Remote Access Security Act pending in the Senate and the 51% guidance attributed to NVIDIA, contracts with Chinese customers in third-country data centers are now under closer watch, even though the formal rules remain the same as a month ago.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why did Oracle cancel the contract with Tencent?

According to the Financial Times, citing two people familiar with the matter, the cancellation came after US officials expressed concern about the agreement. Neither Oracle nor Tencent has confirmed or publicly commented on it.

What chips was Tencent going to lease from Oracle?

Published reports mention up to 100,000 advanced AI chips in Oracle data centers across Southeast Asia, but haven’t specified the model or the country where they were installed.

Is it illegal for a Chinese company to rent cloud GPUs outside China?

Under current US rules, it isn’t generally banned. The House of Representatives passed the Remote Access Security Act in January 2026 to require a license for that remote access, but the bill still needs Senate approval.

Does the cancellation affect Oracle’s other Chinese customers?

The FT doesn’t report changes to other contracts. According to the same newspaper, ByteDance and Alibaba maintain significant chip-leasing agreements with US cloud providers, and Oracle remains a key supplier to ByteDance in Asia.

Sources:

This article is also available in Spanish: “Oracle anula el alquiler de chips de IA a Tencent por 7.000 millones, según el FT”, on revistacloud.com.