For years, the most repeated selling point about Chinese-made memory was simple: “It’s not the fastest, but it’s cheaper.” That equation is starting to break down. In recent weeks, supply chain sources have described a clear shift in strategy among China’s leading producers: less obsession with competing through discounts and more focus on improving processes, securing margins, and advancing toward technologies like DDR5. The result is an uncomfortable reality for the market: Chinese DRAM and NAND prices are no longer significantly diverging from South Korean levels.
The change comes at a delicate time. The industry is experiencing a new phase of supply tension, marked by major manufacturers prioritizing high-margin memories for Artificial Intelligence (AI)—especially HBM—and a demand that extends beyond large data centers: it also includes PCs, servers, consoles, and, indirectly, smartphones. In this context, any rumor of a “price war” acts as fuel for the market.
The rumor: CXMT “dumpting” DDR4 to force a price war
Recent speculation pointed to ChangXin Memory Technologies (CXMT), the leading Chinese DRAM manufacturer. It was claimed that the company was flooding the market with aggressive-priced DDR4 to gain share and pressure traditional giants. However, the picture conveyed by multiple industry sources is different.
According to this information, CXMT has shifted its focus to developing processes for DDR5 and has scaled back its DDR4 exposure to residual volumes, maintaining approximately 10,000 wafers of DDR4 capacity for a small group of longstanding clients. In other words: there is supply, but not the massive surplus that fuels prolonged discount wars.
This nuance is significant because it marks a strategic boundary. A company aiming to “break into the market” typically dumps inventory to generate short-term pain for rivals, even at the cost of margins. The current reading, however, is different: Chinese memory is not aiming to be the “cheap product” forever, but rather an actor seeking to compete on the same technological and profitability levels as its rivals.
Why raise prices now? AI is changing the factory landscape
The underlying factor is the reorientation of industrial capacity. In the current cycle, manufacturers like Samsung, SK Hynix, and Micron are focused on memories for AI accelerators—HBM—because major infrastructure clients (hyperscalers, clouds, integrators) are willing to pay premium prices. This preference shifts resources, investments, and wafers that previously went to conventional DRAM for PCs and servers, also applying pressure on NAND.
With tighter supply, the industry is reacting with measures to prevent distortions: stricter verification procedures and more diligence in order processing have been reported, aiming to curb hoarding. Simultaneously, short-term price forecasts have escalated sharply: there are talks of significant increases in DRAM and NAND contracts driven by scarcity and rebalancing towards higher-margin products.
In this environment, the incentive to sell “at a loss” diminishes. If the market is willing to pay more, and capacity is limited, manufacturers tend to be more selective about whom they sell to and under what conditions. This logic also applies to Chinese producers: maintaining a strategy of “deeply discounted” prices makes less sense if the market itself is raising the price floor.
The domino effect: PCs and smartphones adjust expectations
The price hikes aren’t confined to data centers. The impact is already reaching consumers: analysts and media outlets have reported downward revisions in global smartphone sales forecasts for 2026, citing rising component costs—particularly DRAM and NAND. The message to manufacturers is clear: when memory costs increase, the final product typically has three options—raise the price, cut features, or sacrifice margins—and none are comfortable.
In the PC world, stress is equally evident. Major brands have explored alternatives to ensure supply, including the possibility of sourcing Chinese memory in a market where availability now takes precedence over loyalty to a single supplier. However, if “alternative memory” ceases to be significantly cheaper, the equation again depends on other factors: validation, compatibility, supply stability, and—in certain regions—regulatory risk.
The Chinese bet: grow without promising immediate relief
The price shift also aligns with bigger industrial ambitions. Recent reports point to expansion plans by CXMT and YMTC (China’s NAND reference) with new facilities aimed at increasing capacity in the coming years, in an attempt to reduce dependence on external sources and capitalize on current market conditions. Nonetheless, the industry recognizes that memory doesn’t “scale” from one quarter to another: building factories, equipping them, and reaching competitive yields takes time. Even if growth accelerates, immediate price pressure alleviation isn’t guaranteed.
The consequence for European buyers is twofold. On one hand, Chinese competition could, over time, weaken the pricing power of the “Big Three.” On the other hand, in the short term, the market is rewarding those with existing product and capacity, not those promising “cheap memory.”
An uncomfortable conclusion for the West: China no longer competes solely on price
Chinese DRAM and NAND approaching South Korean levels isn’t just a pricing anecdote. It’s a sign of industrial maturity: when a manufacturer stops “buying market share” through discounts and instead invests in advanced processes, it’s signaling that its priority isn’t just selling more, but consolidating.
For procurement teams, integrators, and infrastructure managers, the message is clear: relying on China as a cheap escape hatch is increasingly unrealistic. By 2026, memory isn’t in “bargain” mode—it’s in “strategic resource” mode.
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ)
What is CXMT and why does it matter in the DRAM market?
CXMT (ChangXin Memory Technologies) is China’s leading DRAM manufacturer. Its evolution matters because China consumes enormous volumes of memory, and if more of that is supplied locally, it can shift global supply flows and price pressures.
How does AI influence DDR5 RAM and SSD pricing?
Because the industry is prioritizing higher-margin memories for AI—like HBM—this reduces available capacity for conventional DDR4, while also tightening supply chains related to manufacturing, packaging, and materials, pushing up prices for DRAM and NAND.
Does this mean cheap DDR4 won’t exist in 2026?
Not necessarily, but it suggests that the window for aggressive discounts may be more limited. If manufacturers keep supply tight and the market continues to pay premiums, DDR4 prices are likely to stabilize higher than in previous cycles.
What should sysadmins and integrators watch for when buying memory from new providers?
Compatibility with platforms (BIOS/UEFI and profiles), stability under load, batch consistency, warranty conditions, and—most importantly—validation in real-world environments (virtualization, databases, light AI) before standardizing purchases.
via: DigiTimes Asia

