Sure, here’s the translation:
—
The hybrid model is solidifying as the new norm as the number of employees firmly rejecting a full return to the office continues to rise.
The debate over returning to the office is escalating again following a new wave of studies and surveys revealing a growing trend: more and more workers say they would rather quit their jobs than return to a full-time in-office model.
According to a recent report published by Bloomberg and backed by data from HR firms like FlexJobs and Gallup, around 61% of U.S. employees currently working remotely or in a hybrid model would not be willing to return to the office five days a week. Most strikingly, an increasing number of them—about 30%—openly state that they would resign if their company forced them to do so.
Flexibility has become non-negotiable
During the pandemic, millions of workers experienced the advantages of remote work for the first time: less commuting, greater autonomy, better work-life balance, and in many cases, even a boost in productivity. This paradigm shift has left a profound impact on work expectations.
“People are no longer willing to sacrifice quality of life for a desk,” notes Sara Sutton, CEO of FlexJobs. “What used to be a benefit is now a demand: work flexibility has become a core value.”
Companies insist, but employees resist
Although many large companies—like Amazon, Google, and JPMorgan—have announced plans to force a return to the office for three to five days a week, these moves are generating internal tensions. In some cases, they’ve even led to mass resignations or organized protests within their teams.
In the case of Amazon, for example, over 30,000 employees signed an open letter in 2023 against the forced return, arguing that the measure would go against the company’s commitment to innovation and productivity.
Impact on talent retention and attraction
Companies that maintain flexible policies—like Dropbox, GitLab, or even new startups like Rippling—are gaining ground in the talent war, especially among tech professionals and qualified young people. These individuals increasingly value environments that offer trust, autonomy, and results over in-person attendance.
Furthermore, according to a McKinsey report, hybrid models are associated with lower voluntary turnover rates, while mandatory return to the office increases the risk of talent attrition by up to 20%.
It’s not just about remote work
Experts agree that the conflict is not solely about working from home but about the perception of control and trust. Forcing employees to return to the office without clearly justifying the benefits creates distrust and a feeling of imposition, especially after years of demonstrating that remote work is effective.
“Companies that ignore this reality risk losing their best employees,” warns Brian Kropp, an analyst at Gartner. “It’s not about whether you return or not, but how you do it and why.”
The future is hybrid (and negotiated)
Overall, the hybrid model—which combines in-person days and remote days—is solidifying as the preferred option for both companies and employees. The key is to allow for a certain degree of personal choice within a flexible framework tailored to the type of task or project.
Meanwhile, the message from workers is clear: returning to the office full-time is not only unwanted, but could be a sufficient reason to leave their jobs. And in an increasingly competitive job market, companies that do not heed this warning could pay a high price.