The platform X, formerly known as Twitter and run by Elon Musk, is facing increased regulatory scrutiny from the European Union (EU). Researchers from the bloc are assessing whether X’s content policies, which have become more permissive under Musk’s leadership, violate the regulations of the Digital Services Act (DSA). These regulations require strict control of misinformation and harmful content on digital platforms.
The “freedom of speech” policy in question
The shift towards greater openness in content moderation, defended as “freedom of speech, not freedom of reach” by Musk, has raised alarms in the EU, which launched an investigation in 2023 following the acquisition of the platform. Authorities want to determine whether this approach jeopardizes user safety and facilitates the spread of harmful or false information.
Moreover, Musk’s increasing involvement in European political matters has raised additional concerns. His public support for the German party Alternative for Germany (AfD), considered far-right, and his comments on regional political decisions are being scrutinized as possible attempts to influence democratic processes.
Algorithmic manipulation: a real risk?
A key point in the investigation is whether X may be using its algorithms to amplify content that favors Musk’s political positions. This possibility contradicts the DSA’s principles of political neutrality and could have far-reaching implications for the European political landscape. Allegations are based on precedent in the United States, where Musk is said to have used the platform to benefit Donald Trump’s campaign.
With rising tensions, the EU is seeking to determine whether the platform is being used as a tool to undemocratically influence key elections in Europe.
Responses and potential consequences
Linda Yaccarino, CEO of X, described the investigation as a direct attack on freedom of speech and defended the platform’s policies. However, the European Union, with its history of imposing significant fines on major tech companies, could act decisively if evidence of non-compliance is found.
The DSA not only regulates content but also sets clear standards for neutrality and transparency on digital platforms. A violation of these regulations could result in hefty fines and even operational restrictions for X in Europe.
A precedent for the future
This case could set important precedents regarding how tech platforms must manage content moderation and the political involvement of their leaders. At a time when social media has a growing impact on democracy, the findings of this investigation will be crucial in establishing clear boundaries between freedom of speech and the social responsibility of digital platforms.
Source: Social Media News