Technological Subscription Fatigue: A Model That Exhausts Consumers

In 2024, “subscription fatigue” became a global phenomenon, a direct result of the uncontrolled expansion of the “everything as a service” (XaaS) business model. What began with the rise of streaming platforms and software applications has spread to almost every industry, from automotive to essential services, leaving consumers facing an increasing financial burden and a sense of dissatisfaction.

The Rise of the Subscription Model

The subscription model offers significant advantages for businesses: recurring revenue, financial predictability, and a constant stream of user data. However, its rapid adoption and expansion have surpassed reasonable limits.

Products that were once one-time purchases or basic services are now locked behind a wall of monthly or annual payments. Recent examples include:

  • Automobiles: Manufacturers such as BMW and Mercedes have implemented subscriptions for features like heated seats or advanced cruise control, elements that historically were included in the total cost of the vehicle.
  • Printers: Brands like HP have adopted subscription models for ink usage, where access to cartridges is contingent upon regular payments, regardless of whether users actually print frequently.
  • Business Software: VMware, following its acquisition by Broadcom, has shifted to an exclusively subscription-based model, eliminating perpetual licensing options that were once standard in the industry.
  • Essential Services: Both Microsoft and Google have turned their email platforms and productivity suites into subscription commodities, periodically raising prices and leaving few viable alternatives for captive users.

Causes of Subscription Exhaustion

1. Financial Saturation

The number of subscription services that an average consumer must manage has grown exponentially. According to a study by Deloitte, the average household in 2024 pays for between 7 and 12 active subscriptions, ranging from entertainment to essential services. This represents a significant burden, especially in a global economic context of inflation.

2. Lack of Alternative Options

The subscription model limits the consumer’s ability to choose. Companies like Microsoft, with their Service Provider License Agreement (SPLA) model, and Google have turned their basic services into essentials for businesses and consumers. Organizations, particularly small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs), are trapped in contracts that force them to pay for recurring services, even when these exceed their operational needs.

3. Price Increases

The initial appeal of subscription services is often their affordable cost, but once consumers are integrated into the system, companies tend to raise prices. Both Google and Microsoft have increased their fees for email and business productivity services like Google Workspace and Microsoft 365, leaving users with few options to migrate.

4. Degraded User Experience

The shift towards subscriptions prioritizes recurring revenue over user experience. Instead of offering tangible improvements, many companies restrict functionalities behind additional payments. For example, firmware updates for devices like security cameras and routers are locked behind subscriptions.

Impact on Consumers and Businesses

On Consumers

Subscription fatigue not only impacts wallets but also value perception. Users feel they are repeatedly paying for services that used to be standard. This has generated dissatisfaction and a growing interest in more sustainable alternatives, such as open-source software options, second-hand hardware, or less restrictive “freemium” solutions.

On Businesses

In the short term, the subscription model generates stable revenue, but in the long term, it can erode consumer trust and loyalty. Criticism of companies that impose excessive fees or restrictive models has increased, and in some cases, has led to boycotts or reputational loss.

Examples of Controversial Subscription Models

  • VMware and Broadcom: VMware’s transition to an exclusively subscription model following its acquisition by Broadcom has generated backlash in the tech community, particularly among companies that relied on perpetual licenses.
  • BMW and Mercedes: The implementation of monthly fees for features like heated seats has been perceived as an attempt to monetize elements that consumers already consider paid for when they purchase the vehicle.
  • Microsoft and Google: Both giants have transformed their productivity tools into unavoidable subscriptions for most businesses, with regular price increases disproportionately affecting SMEs.

What Can Consumers Do?

  1. Subscription Audits: Consumers and businesses should conduct periodic audits to identify unnecessary subscriptions and cancel them.
  2. Explore Alternatives: Look for one-time payment options or free tools like LibreOffice for productivity or open-source operating systems.
  3. Demand Transparency: Companies need to be clear about the costs and benefits of their subscription models, and users should push for regulations that limit abusive practices.

Conclusion

The subscription model, while initially attractive, has reached unsustainable levels that erode both consumer trust and purchasing power. As long as companies continue to prioritize recurring revenue over user experience, subscription fatigue will only grow.

By 2025, it will be crucial for organizations to reconsider their strategies, balancing financial sustainability with a focus more centered on the needs and expectations of their customers. Without this shift, they risk losing their consumer base as less restrictive and more ethical alternatives gain traction in the market.

Scroll to Top